Ecocriticism: Theory, History, and Literary Analysis

Explore This Topic

Ecocriticism addresses a critical tradition that assigns the natural world a primarily symbolic function. This theory shifts analytical focus to the environment’s constitutive role within literary systems. It analyzes how literature portrays and produces concepts of the relationship between human societies and their physical surroundings, an analysis that examines the governing beliefs behind this division and considers how narrative conventions articulate perspectives on location, ecology, and being.

The theory performs a distinct analytical task. Its practice uncovers a text’s foundational assumptions about the environment and identifies the ways narratives prioritize human perspectives. This analytical work demonstrates literature’s role within the broader cultural conversations that determine how societies interact with the living world. The theory provides the necessary framework to interpret texts, such as classic pastoral poetry and contemporary climate fiction, as participants in an urgent ecological reality.

Historical Development: From Pastoral to the Material Turn

Ecocriticism began as “literary ecology” in the 1970s, introduced by Joseph Meeker in The Comedy of Survival: Studies in Literary Ecology (1972). This foundational argument positioned literature as a medium for analyzing human conduct within ecological networks and established an ethical groundwork for the field.

The theory consolidated into a formal academic discipline during the early 1990s. This first wave was defined by key figures like Cheryll Glotfelty, who helped popularize the field, and Lawrence Buell, whose seminal work The Environmental Imagination (1995) provided a major theoretical foundation by exploring how literary texts reflect and influence environmental values. This phase prioritized the study of nature writing and the critique of human-centered values in literary canons, emphasizing wilderness.

A second wave incorporated the framework of environmental justice by broadening critical focus to include urban and compromised landscapes while analyzing the confluence of race, class, and gender. The current, third wave is characterized by the “material turn.” Informed by posthumanist philosophy, it challenges the division between human and nonhuman entities and explores the narrative agency of the material world, reconceiving the environment as an active participant in storytelling.

Core Theoretical Tenets

Ecocriticism operates through a set of interconnected principles that redefine the relationship between text and world. These principles shift analysis from a focus on the environment as a subject within the text to an investigation of its operational role within literary systems.

Critiquing Anthropocentrism: A primary tenet involves the critique of anthropocentrism, the human-centered worldview that positions nature as a passive resource. Ecocritical reading identifies and challenges this hierarchy within narrative structures by examining how texts either reinforce or subvert the presumed centrality of human experience.
The Ecocentric Perspective: This critique expands into the concept of ecocentrism, which argues for the intrinsic value of the physical environment. An ecocentric perspective seeks to locate instances where that environment functions as an autonomous presence or agent within a text, independent of human symbolism or utility.
Material Agency: Closely related is the principle of material agency. Influenced by the “material turn,” this tenet investigates the capacity of the physical world (e.g., animals, plants, landscapes, weather, objects) to act upon and influence narrative events. It questions the stability of the human subject by demonstrating how corporeal and ecological realities constrain, enable, or redirect human action.
The Significance of Place: Finally, ecocriticism is fundamentally concerned with place. This concept moves beyond a generic environment to signify a specific location formed by ecological processes and cultural history. The theory analyzes how literature constructs a “sense of place” and how displacement or environmental degradation affects this relationship. This focus connects the ethical and the aesthetic as it examines how narratives create attachment to, or alienation from, the physical world.

Method in Practice: An Ecocritical Reading

An ecocritical analysis demonstrates the theory’s capacity to transform literary interpretation. A reading of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein (1818) exemplifies this shift. It moves beyond the novel’s classic themes of ambition and hubris to reveal a foundational environmental logic. This reading recalibrates the text, showing it to be less a parable about “playing God” and more a prescient exploration of the catastrophic consequences that arise when life is engineered in abstraction from the sustaining networks of the natural world.

An Ecocentric Critique of Ambition

The novel’s central tragedy is often framed as Victor Frankenstein’s transgression against divine law. An ecocentric reading locates the crime within the material world. Frankenstein’s act constitutes the violent severance of life from any sustaining ecological context. The Creature is assembled from fragments of the charnel house and the dissecting-room, then abandoned without a place in the natural order.

The Creature’s existence is a profound ecological dislocation. He belongs to no habitat, participates in no food web, and finds no companionship among either humans or animals. The narrative frames this dislocation in environmental terms, through the Creature’s own longing for a “sympathizing” natural counterpart and his ultimate retreat into the “everlasting ices” of the Arctic, a sterile non-place that mirrors his ontological condition.

Landscape as Narrative Agent

The principle of material agency is evident in Shelley’s use of landscape, which functions as an active participant that reflects and directs the moral logic of the plot. The sublime glaciers of Mont Blanc and the desolate Orkney Islands operate as physical manifestations of isolation and judgment.

The Arctic wastes that consume both creator and creation in the final act perform a narrative function of terminal negation. This environment, indifferent to human drama, enacts the ultimate consequence of a philosophy that seeks to dominate nature without understanding its interconnected systems.

Place and Displacement

The novel’s structure is a sustained narrative of displacement. The action moves from Geneva to Ingolstadt, to the Orkneys, and finally to the Arctic, tracing a geographic progression toward increasingly inhospitable and non-domestic spaces. This movement externalizes the Creature’s and Frankenstein’s progressive alienation from community and ecological belonging.

A stable “sense of place,” associated with the domestic sphere of the Frankenstein family home, is systematically destroyed. The analysis of these locations shows how Shelley uses environmental setting to map a journey that charts a psychological and ethical dissolution tied to physical dislocation.

Critiques and Future Directions

Ecocriticism’s development has provoked substantive critiques. A primary critique argues that the field’s early focus on wilderness and canonical nature writing risked reinforcing a narrow, often Anglo-American and white, literary perspective. That focus could marginalize narratives from urban, industrial, or postcolonial environments and neglect issues of environmental justice.

A related contention centers on the theory’s potential for relativism. By treating all texts as discursive constructions within culture, ecocriticism can face challenges in making evaluative claims about environmental representation or prescribing ethical positions. Furthermore, the political efficacy of a primarily textual analysis remains a subject of debate, with critics questioning its capacity to effect material ecological change beyond the academy.

These critiques have directly informed the field’s trajectory. The emphasis on environmental justice in the second wave and the nonhuman turn in the third wave respond to earlier limitations. Future directions continue this expansion by engaging with critical race studies, disability studies, and energy humanities to analyze the uneven bodily and social impacts of environmental crisis. For a detailed analysis of one key literary manifestation of this, see the companion article on climate fiction.

The analysis of nature, environment, and place in literature expands the political scope of criticism to include the non-human world, marking a vital contemporary branch of theory detailed in Literary Theory: A Guide to Critical Frameworks.